Approved by the Decree of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan

dated November 30, 2016

 

Rule on the Submission and Financing of Orders by State Bodies to the Center for Analysis of Economic Reforms and Communication

 

1. General Provision

This Rule has been prepared on the basis of the “Charter of the Center for Analysis of Economic Reforms and Communication”, approved by Decree No. 879 of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated April 20, 2016, and regulates the relations concerning the submission and financing of orders by state bodies to the Center for Analysis of Economic Reforms and Communication (hereinafter – the Center).

2. Services Provided by the Center upon Orders of State Bodies

2.0. For the purposes of this Rule, the Center provides the following services (hereinafter – services) upon orders of state bodies:

2.0.1. conducting feasibility studies and risk assessments of state programs and economic incentive projects, as well as conducting surveys among stakeholders regarding such projects;

2.0.2. monitoring and evaluation of activities carried out in industrial parks, industrial districts and agro-parks, as well as monitoring and evaluation of state programs of economic orientation;

2.0.3. evaluating the economic efficiency of completed state programs of economic orientation and state investment projects.

3. Submission of Orders by State Bodies

3.1. For the purpose of providing the services specified in Section 2 of this Rule, state bodies and organizations financed from the state budget shall submit their orders for the following year to the Center by May 1 of the current year, while other state bodies shall submit orders to the Center when necessary.

3.2. A covering letter, justification for the necessity of the service, and other documents as determined by the ordering entity shall be attached to the order specified in paragraph 3.1 of this Rule.

3.3. Within 10 (ten) business days following receipt of the order, the Center shall provide the ordering entity with information on the duration of the work to be performed and the financial-economic justification, including the service fee.

3.4. State bodies and organizations financed from the state budget shall submit to the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Azerbaijan, by July 1 of the current year, proposals related to the forecasting of funds required for the financing of the services, in accordance with Article 11.8 of the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On the Budget System”.

3.5. Upon receipt of the order specified in paragraph 3.1 of this Rule, the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Azerbaijan shall take measures to forecast the required funds within the relevant functional section of the state budget.

3.6. Within 10 (ten) business days after the approval of the budget indicators for the following year in accordance with applicable legislation, state bodies and organizations financed from the state budget shall provide the Center with information on the funds allocated in the state budget for the services specified in Section 2 of this Rule.

3.7. State bodies and organizations financed from the state budget shall conclude contracts with the Center within the limits of funds allocated in the state budget for the provision of such services, in accordance with the requirements of the Civil Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

3.8. Except for state bodies and organizations financed from the state budget, other state bodies may conclude a contract with the Center within 6 (six) months after receiving the information specified in paragraph 3.3 of this Rule, in accordance with the requirements of the Civil Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

4. Financing of Services Provided by the Center

4.1. Payment for the services specified in Section 2 of this Rule for state bodies and organizations financed from the state budget shall be carried out within the funds allocated to those bodies in the state budget for this purpose.

4.2. State bodies and organizations financed from the state budget shall submit their respective orders, expenditure schedules, and financing documents to the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Azerbaijan in accordance with the terms of the contract concluded with the Center.

4.3. The Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Azerbaijan, after reviewing the applications, expenditure schedules, and financing documents submitted by state bodies and organizations financed from the state budget, shall ensure financing within the limits of the approved budget allocations in accordance with the relevant budget classification.

4.4. State bodies and organizations financed from the state budget shall ensure the transfer to the Center of the funds allocated from the state budget for the services provided, in accordance with the terms of the contract specified in paragraph 3.7 of this Rule.

4.5. In the case of state bodies other than those financed from the state budget, the funds specified in the contract concluded in accordance with paragraph 3.8 of this Rule, and required pursuant to paragraph 3.3 of this Rule, shall be transferred to the Center by those state bodies.

 

Approved by the Decree of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan
dated March 6, 2021

Rules on the Preparation, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of State Programs

 

1. General Provisions

1.1. The “Rules on the Preparation, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of State Programs” (hereinafter – the Rules) have been prepared in accordance with paragraph 2.2 of the Decree No. 990 of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated July 13, 2016, “On Amendments to the Charter of the Center for Analysis of Economic Reforms and Communication,” which was approved by Decree No. 879 of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated April 20, 2016.

1.2. These Rules regulate matters relating to the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of state programs, strategies, national action plans, concepts, and other similar documents (hereinafter – state program).

1.3. A state program is a strategic planning document that incorporates instruments of state policy and consists of a set of mutually coordinated measures—by objectives, implementation timelines, implementing bodies and resources—aimed at achieving the priorities and goals of state policy in the sphere of the country’s socio-economic development.

1.4. Tasks that fall directly within the powers of state bodies (agencies), state-owned legal entities and legal entities in which the controlling stake (shares) belongs to the state, as well as public legal entities established on behalf of the state (hereinafter – state body (agency)), may not be defined as measures under a state program.

1.5. These Rules do not apply to activities related to the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of state investment programs, nor to programs deemed state secrets for reasons of state security.

1.6. The key terms used in these Rules have the following meanings:

1.6.1. Monitoring – the periodic review, within specified time limits, of the work carried out and results achieved under a state program, through the systematic collection of data on that state program;

1.6.2. Evaluation – the systematic and objective measurement of the implementation and results of a state program, and the determination of the level of fulfillment of tasks and achievement of goals set in the program, as well as its effectiveness, efficiency, final outcomes, relevance and sustainability;

1.6.3. State program drafting body (agency) – the state body (agency) that prepares the draft state program in line with its areas of activity and with due regard to the requirements of these Rules;

1.6.4. Monitoring and evaluation body (agency) – the body (agency) that carries out the monitoring and evaluation of state programs in accordance with these Rules;

1.6.5. Coordinating body (agency) – the state body (agency) designated by the legal act approving the relevant state program to ensure coordination of its implementation;

1.6.6. Measure – an activity implemented under a state program to achieve results, with the involvement of financial resources, technical assistance and other resources;

1.6.7. Resources – financial, human and other resources used to implement the measures defined by a state program;

1.6.8. Immediate (initial) results – initial indicators of the implementation of measures defined by a state program;

1.6.9. Intermediate results – the short- and medium-term effects that the immediate results of measures defined by a state program may generate or have generated;

1.6.10. Final results – the ultimate indicators of the implementation of measures defined by a state program;

1.6.11. Effectiveness – an assessment criterion reflecting the extent to which the goals and targets of a state program have been or will be achieved;

1.6.12. Efficiency – an assessment criterion measuring the rate at which resources expended for the implementation of a state program are converted into intended results;

1.6.13. Relevance – an assessment criterion evaluating the extent to which the goals of a state program meet needs or priorities within established target indicators;

1.6.14. Indicator – a quantitative or qualitative metric that enables simple and reliable measurement of results achieved under a state program, reflects changes resulting from the program’s application, and helps assess the performance of implementing bodies (agencies);

1.6.15. Stakeholders – state bodies (agencies) and natural and legal persons who are directly or indirectly interested in the implementation or evaluation of a state program;

1.6.16. Target group – state bodies (agencies) and natural and legal persons intended to benefit from the results of a state program.

2. Preparation and Approval of a State Program

2.1. Preparation of a state program entails the process of drafting the relevant state program on the basis of technically and economically substantiated proposals aligned with the country’s main directions and priorities for socio-economic development, the requirements of these Rules, and the strategic plans of the relevant state bodies (agencies).

2.2. In preparing the draft state program, account shall be taken of the objectives and tasks of nationally significant projects being implemented in the relevant fields, as well as the impacts of the program’s application on other sectors.

2.3. During the drafting of a state program, consultations must be held with the relevant state bodies (agencies), and, in accordance with the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On Public Participation,” public hearings and discussions on the state program must be ensured.

2.4. The structure of a state program shall comprise the following sections:

2.4.1. Executive summary – a synopsis of the key issues set out in the state program;

2.4.2. Global trends – a description of principal trends observed in the sector to which the state program relates, major anticipated changes in that sector, and their potential impacts on the Republic of Azerbaijan;

2.4.3. Analysis of the current situation – brief information on the current situation and work performed in the sector covered by the state program in the country, and a consolidated description of the issues necessitating the preparation of the program, as well as the analyses conducted and results obtained in this regard;

2.4.4. Target indicators – indicators identified as the principal benchmarks to be achieved during the period covered by the state program;

2.4.5. Objectives – a description of the aims set to achieve the target indicators identified under the state program;

2.4.6. Priority areas – a description of concrete measures to be implemented to realize the objectives, the results to be achieved, and the resources required;

2.4.7. Financing mechanisms – a description of the volume of funds determined to achieve the objectives established under the state program and the sources for providing such funds;

2.4.8. Action plan – a description of the plan indicating, for each measure defined under the state program, the implementing bodies (primary and other implementers) and implementation periods, as well as the expected results and result indicators for each priority area.

2.5. In accordance with sub-paragraph 2.4.3 of these Rules, the following methods may be employed in the analysis of the current situation in the relevant sector:

2.5.1. Competitive advantage – analyses aimed at identifying features that grant a competitive advantage in the relevant sector;

2.5.2. Demand-market analysis – analyses to identify key demand markets for the future formation of sales markets in the sector where a competitive advantage has been identified;

2.5.3. Diagnostic analysis – analyses aimed at identifying problems along the value chain in the relevant sector and possible solutions thereto;

2.5.4. SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) – identification of the sector’s strengths and weaknesses, and the determination of opportunities and threats.

2.6. When preparing a state program, in addition to the methods specified in paragraph 2.5 of these Rules, other methods applied in international practice may be used in analyzing the current situation in the relevant sector, taking into account the subject matter of the program.

2.7. When preparing a state program, after problems in the relevant sector have been identified through analysis of the current situation and study of international practice, target indicators and the objectives set to reach those indicators shall be determined.

2.8. In determining the targets of a state program, the country’s forecast indicators of socio-economic development, as well as the feasibility of the measures to be implemented, shall be taken into account.

2.9. Each priority area serving the attainment of the objectives determined pursuant to paragraph 2.7 of these Rules shall be structured as follows:

2.9.1. Justification – a description of the main reasons for prioritizing the relevant area, existing problems and deficiencies;

2.9.2. Measures to be taken – the title and description of the measures that need to be implemented within the implementation period set by the state program for the priority area;

2.9.3. Expected outcomes and result indicators – result indicators predetermined for the purpose of measuring future effectiveness in the priority area and the target indicators expected to be achieved for those indicators as a result of implementing the measures under the priority area;

2.9.4. Expected risks and risk-mitigation measures – the main risk factors that may arise during implementation of the measures defined for the priority area and the measures to be undertaken to eliminate their effects;

2.9.5. Required funds (where applicable) – the amount of funds required to implement the measures envisaged for the priority area;

2.9.6. Investment opportunities (where applicable) – business opportunities arising for the private sector in the course of implementing the measures envisaged within the priority area.

2.10. In preparing result indicators pursuant to sub-paragraph 2.9.3 of these Rules, the base year, the indicator for the base year, and the sources of information for that indicator shall be determined, with due regard to the nature of each indicator in relation to “immediate results,” “intermediate results,” and “final results.”

2.11. On the basis of base-year indicators, within the period covered by the state program, target indicators shall be determined annually for “immediate results,” at the mid-point of the program’s implementation period for “intermediate results” (or at that time if the implementation period for a given priority ends then), and upon completion of the state program for “final results.”

2.12. The action plan of the state program and the primary and other implementers of the relevant measures shall be determined in accordance with the areas of activity of the relevant state bodies (agencies) (Annex No. 1).

2.13. International organizations, non-governmental organizations, representatives of the public and private sectors, independent experts and other stakeholders may be involved in the process of preparing a state program in accordance with these Rules.

2.14. The state body (agency) drafting the state program shall prepare the draft in compliance with the requirements of the Constitutional Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On Normative Legal Acts” and paragraph 2.12 of the “Regulation on the Procedure for Drafting and Adopting Normative Legal Acts of Executive Authorities,” approved by Decree No. 772 of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated August 24, 2002, and shall submit it to the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

2.15. The draft state program shall be reviewed by the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan and, subject to compliance with the requirements of the normative legal acts specified in paragraph 2.14 of these Rules, shall be submitted to the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan for approval.

2.16. The state program shall be approved by legal acts of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan in accordance with sub-paragraph 3 of Article 109 of the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

 

3. Implementation of the State Program

3.1. The implementation of the state program shall mean the full and timely execution, by the implementing bodies, of the measures envisaged in the state program, using the financing sources specified therein, in order to achieve the goals set forth.

3.2. The coordination and supervision of the implementation of the measures provided for in the state program shall be carried out by the coordinating body (agency).

3.3. For the purpose of ensuring the effective organization of the implementation of the state program, a working group composed of representatives of the primary and other implementing bodies (agencies) specified in the state program shall be established under the leadership of the coordinating body (agency).

3.4. The working group established in accordance with paragraph 3.3 of these Rules shall convene at least once a year, and discussions shall be held regarding the resolution of major issues arising during the implementation process.

3.5. For the purpose of organizing the implementation of the measures envisaged in the state program, sub-working groups may be established for each priority area and/or specific measures (hereinafter – priority areas).

3.6. Annual reports on the implementation status and outcomes of the measures envisaged in the state program shall be prepared by the relevant state bodies (agencies) and submitted to the coordinating body (agency), together with supporting documents, no later than January 20 of each year.

3.7. The coordinating body (agency) shall summarize and analyze the information submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.6 of these Rules and shall submit the report it prepares to the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

 

4. Monitoring and Evaluation of the State Program

4.1. The body (agency) responsible for monitoring and evaluation of the state program shall be determined at the time of approval of the state program. The coordinating body (agency) may not be designated as the monitoring and evaluation body (agency) for state programs.

4.2. Local and/or international experts may be involved in the monitoring and evaluation process of the state program.

4.3. In conducting monitoring and evaluation of the state program, the monitoring and evaluation body (agency) may cooperate with the coordinating body (agency), as well as with the primary and other implementing bodies (agencies) for the relevant priority areas.

4.4. The results of monitoring of the state program shall be reflected in the annual report prepared by the monitoring and evaluation body (agency).

4.5. Monitoring of the state program shall be carried out in the form of annual monitoring of the implementation status and results of the measures, based on the reports and supporting documents collected by the coordinating body (agency) in accordance with paragraph 3.6 of these Rules and submitted to the monitoring and evaluation body (agency).

4.6. Monitoring of the implementation status of state programs shall be conducted in accordance with the methodology established by these Rules, and a report on the results of monitoring shall be prepared (Annexes No. 2 and No. 3).

4.7. Monitoring of the results of the state program shall be conducted on the basis of a comparison between the target indicators defined for the result indicators of the state program and the actual indicators achieved, and a report on the monitoring of results shall be prepared (Annex No. 4).

4.8. During monitoring of the implementation status and results of the state program, analysis of the submitted reports shall be carried out, and the information shall be clarified through discussions with representatives of the relevant state bodies (agencies). Additional information and supporting documents regarding the implementation status of measures may be requested from the relevant state bodies (agencies).

4.9. Monitoring of the implementation of the state program in accordance with these Rules does not exclude the verification, within the framework of state financial control, of the proper and efficient expenditure of funds allocated from the state budget for the implementation of the state program, nor does it exclude the conduct of state oversight measures by the Administration of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan to ensure compliance with legislation and executive discipline, or the evaluation of the activities of executive authorities, state bodies, and the effectiveness of the projects implemented by them.

4.10. During monitoring of the implementation status and results of the state program, the activities of each state body (agency) acting as the primary implementer of the state program shall also be evaluated, and for this purpose, their performance rating shall be calculated.

4.11. During evaluation of the state program, the actual indicators shall be compared with the indicators prior to the implementation of the measures envisaged in the program for the relevant sector, and efficiency shall be calculated.

4.12. Evaluation of the state program shall be conducted at the implementation stage and upon completion of the state program in the following sequence:

4.12.1. Preparation for evaluation – development of evaluation questions by the monitoring and evaluation body (agency), enabling assessment of effectiveness, relevance and efficiency, taking into account the opinion of the coordinating body (agency);

4.12.2. Evaluation plan – preparation of an evaluation plan in the form established by these Rules (Annex No. 5);

4.12.3. Preparation of the evaluation report and recommendations – preparation of the evaluation report on the state program and the relevant recommendation document.

4.13. Evaluation of a state program shall be carried out after half of the implementation period has elapsed or after the completion of the state program. State programs with an implementation period of three (3) years or less shall be evaluated only after completion of the program.

4.14. The report on monitoring of the implementation status and results of the state program shall be submitted to the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan annually, and the evaluation report shall be submitted after the timeframe specified in paragraph 4.13 of these Rules has elapsed.

 

4.15. Within one month after the submission of the final evaluation report of the state program to the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the report shall be posted and made publicly available on the official websites of both the monitoring and evaluation body (agency) and the coordinating body (agency).

 

Annex No. 1

to the “Rules on the Preparation, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of State Programs”

Action Plan of the State Program

* The implementation period shall be determined on at least an annual basis

**Sub-measures may also be identified for each measure

 

                                                                                                                                              Annex No. 2

to the “Rules on the Preparation, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of State Programs”

 

Methodology for Monitoring the Implementation Status of the State Program  

1. The following methods are used in collecting and processing information for monitoring the implementation status of the measures envisaged in the state program:

1.1. analysis of reports and supporting documents submitted by the coordinating body (agency);
1.2. analysis of documents for the purpose of determining the implementation status of the measure;
1.3. organization of discussions with relevant state bodies (agencies) and specialists;
1.4. obtaining information from third parties;
1.5. organization of on-site inspection activities.

2. Monitoring of the implementation status of the measures envisaged in the state program shall be carried out in the following sequence:

2.1. Collection and analysis of information and supporting documents

2.1.1. The monitoring and evaluation body (agency) reviews the work performed under each measure and the corresponding supporting documents, and conducts an initial assessment within the framework of monitoring the implementation status of the measures, substantiating it under the following criteria:

1.the measure has been implemented;

2.the measure has been partially implemented;

3.the measure has not been implemented.

2.2. Organization of discussions with relevant state bodies (agencies)

2.2.1. After the initial assessment is conducted within the framework of monitoring the implementation status of the measures envisaged in the state program, the monitoring and evaluation body (agency), together with the relevant bodies (agencies), holds discussions on the work performed and the main challenges encountered during implementation. During the discussions, the relevant body (agency) may submit additional information concerning the implementation status of the measures, and the main challenges encountered in the implementation process and ways to resolve them may be discussed.

2.3. Organization of discussions with specialists

2.3.1. After discussions with the relevant state bodies (agencies) are completed and supporting documents are obtained, further discussions are held with specialists in the relevant field on the implementation status of the measures, including the main challenges identified by relevant state bodies (agencies), proposed solutions, and other related issues. The monitoring and evaluation body (agency) may involve international organizations, civil society institutions, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders in these discussions.

2.4. Evaluation of the measures based on information obtained during monitoring of the implementation status

2.4.1. After the completion of the processes of obtaining and verifying information and organizing discussions as set out in paragraphs 2.1–2.3 of this Methodology, the necessary clarifications shall be made to the initial assessment within the framework of monitoring the implementation status of the measures, and each measure shall be evaluated with the corresponding score based on the final assessment results as follows:

1.measure implemented – 1 point;

2.measure partially implemented – 0.5 point;

3.measure not implemented – 0 points.

2.5. Evaluation of the priority areas and overall implementation status of the state program

2.5.1. The evaluation of the priority areas defined under the state program and the overall implementation status of the state program shall be carried out as follows:

1.Based on the implementation status of the measures, the relative weight is determined by calculating the ratio of the number of measures assessed as “implemented,” “partially implemented,” and “not implemented” to the total number of measures under the priority area or the state program;

2.The overall implementation status of the priority area is evaluated using the following formula:

(İE+Qİ+İB)/TS*100=İF

where:

İE – total points for implemented measures;
Qİ – total points for partially implemented measures;
İB – total points for measures not implemented;
TS – total number of measures under the priority area;
İF – implementation percentage for the priority area.

Note: If all measures envisaged under a priority area are implemented, the ratio of the total score for all measures to the total number of measures shall be equal to the maximum value of 1.

3. The results obtained based on the overall implementation status of the priority area shall be evaluated as follows:

where:

0–50 percent range – red (unacceptable);
51–80 percent range – yellow (acceptable);
81–100 percent range – green (satisfactory).

4. The overall implementation status of the state program shall be evaluated using the following formula:

PB/PS*100 = DPQ

where:

FB – total score for the priority areas

PS – number of priority areas

DSQ – implementation percentage of the state program

5. The result obtained from the overall assessment of the implementation status of the state program shall be evaluated as follows:

where:

0–50 percent range – red (unacceptable);
51–80 percent range – yellow (acceptable);
81–100 percent range – green (satisfactory).

6. Based on the assessment of the measures assigned to each main executing body (agency) under the state program, and depending on the implementation status of those measures, the performance results of the main executing bodies (agencies) shall be evaluated as follows:

TB/TS*100= İQF

where:

TB – total score for the measures for which the bodies (agencies) act as the main executor;

TS – total number of measures for which the bodies (agencies) act as the main executor;

İQF – performance results of the executing bodies (agencies) (in percentage).

7. The results obtained from the overall assessment of the main executing bodies (agencies) in relation to the measures defined in the state program shall be evaluated as follows:

where:

0–50 percent range – red (unacceptable);
51–80 percent range – yellow (acceptable);
81–100 percent range – green (satisfactory).

 

Annex No. 3

to the “Rules on the Preparation, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of State Programs”

 

Monitoring Report

on the Implementation Status of the State Program

 

Name of the State Program:

Brief Information on the Implementation Status:

General Structure of the Executive Summary:

– overall assessment of the implementation status of the measures envisaged in the state program;
– main activities carried out in connection with the implementation of the state program;
– areas with low implementation performance regarding the measures envisaged in the state program;
– key challenges encountered during the implementation of the state program*;
– recommendations for addressing the challenges.

Priority Area 1:

 

– brief description of the work carried out (covering all measures implemented);
– work performed in relation to the implementation of the measures envisaged under the priority area;
– major challenges encountered in the course of implementing the measures under the priority area;
– recommendations for addressing the challenges.

 

Implementation Status of the Measures Envisaged under the Priority Areas

 

Risk Review:

Monitoring of risks aims to reduce the likelihood of the risks occurring and/or to mitigate their potential impact.

Note: General guidance for the body (agency) responsible for monitoring and evaluating the implementation status of the state program:

– An assessment of “implemented” indicates that all activities envisaged under the measure have already been carried out during the reporting period and that implementation of the measure has been completed;

– An assessment of “partially implemented” indicates that significant steps have been taken towards the implementation of the measure and that the projects envisaged under that measure have been prepared and/or partially carried out;

– An assessment of “not implemented” indicates that no practical steps have been taken towards the implementation of the measure.

* One or several of the most significant challenges encountered during the implementation of the measures envisaged in the state program shall be indicated.

 

 

Annex No. 4

to the “Rules on the Preparation, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of State Programs”

 

Monitoring Report

on the Results of the State Program

 

Name of the State Program:
Brief Information on the Implementation Status:

The brief information shall consist of the following two main parts:

General Assessment of the State Program:

– evaluation of the priority areas envisaged in the state program;
– analysis of the initial result indicators (key performance indicators identified for the priority areas) determined under the state program;
– assessment of the impact of the state program on the country’s socio-economic development indicators (GDP, employment, etc.);
– level of achievement of the objectives determined in the state program.

Brief Numerical Description of the Evaluation Results:

– comparative analysis of the planned investment amount and the amount spent (in percentage);
– implementation performance of the measures determined in the state program (based on the criteria “implemented”, “partially implemented”, “not implemented”).

Priority Area 1:

Brief Information on the Implementation Status

The brief information covers progress made during the past year regarding the implementation of the measures determined under the priority areas and the results achieved.

Analysis of results obtained from the implementation of the measures identified for the priority area, carried out as follows:

– use of key performance indicators;
– use of additional data beyond the key performance indicators;
– evaluation of the obtained results in accordance with the analyses.

Analysis of the Implementation Status of the Measures Identified under the Priority Areas:

Major challenges encountered during the implementation of the measures identified under the priority areas*
Recommendations for addressing the challenges**

Amount of funds spent for the implementation of the measures identified for the priority area (may be presented in a chart).

 

* One or several of the most significant challenges encountered during the implementation of the measures envisaged in the state program must be noted. Challenges should be ranked according to their level of priority.
** Recommendations and/or relevant measures for addressing the identified challenges must be provided.

 

Annex No. 5

to the “Rules on the Preparation, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of State Programs”

 

State Program Evaluation

P L A N